It's a Cannon!! Oh, wait, a canon. Sorry.
It's a Canon!
Exploring how the Church determined which books belong in Sacred Scripture—the authority, history, and differences between Catholic and Protestant Bibles that every believer should understand.
📚 The Rule of Sacred Books
The word "canon" (not "cannon"!) comes from the Greek word meaning "rule" or "standard." The biblical canon is the official list of books that the Church recognizes as divinely inspired Scripture. Understanding how this canon was formed—and why Catholics and Protestants have different numbers of books—is crucial for defending the faith.
📜 Thomistic Foundation: Scripture and Church Authority
According to St. Thomas Aquinas, the authority to determine the biblical canon belongs to the Church, which received this authority from Christ Himself. In the Summa Theologica, Aquinas explains that "the formal object of faith is the First Truth as manifested in Holy Scripture and the teaching of the Church" (ST II-II, q.5, a.3). The Church's role in determining the canon demonstrates that "Scripture depends on the Church for its authority, not the Church on Scripture alone" (ST II-II, q.1, a.9).
What is the Biblical Canon?
🔍 Definition and Authority
The biblical canon is the definitive list of books that constitute Sacred Scripture. This list was determined by the Church under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, using criteria established by apostolic tradition. The canon is not arbitrary but based on divine inspiration, apostolic origin, and acceptance by the universal Church.
🏛️ Catholic vs. Protestant Canons
Catholic Canon
Old Testament: 46 books
New Testament: 27 books
Established by councils in the 4th century, confirmed at Trent (1546)
Protestant Canon
Old Testament: 39 books
New Testament: 27 books
Reduced by Luther and other reformers (16th century)
⚔️ The Protestant Problem
Protestants face a fundamental logical problem: they accept the Church's authority to determine the New Testament canon while rejecting its authority regarding the Old Testament. They also accept the Church's authority to determine which books are Scripture while denying the Church's authority to interpret Scripture. This inconsistency undermines the sola scriptura principle.
🛡️ Why This Matters
The canon question strikes at the heart of religious authority. If the Bible is the sole rule of faith, who has the authority to determine what belongs in the Bible? The Bible doesn't contain its own table of contents, so some external authority must make this determination. For Catholics, this authority is the Church; for Protestants, it's often individual judgment or scholarly consensus.
Historical Development of the Canon
📚 The Old Testament Foundation
The Old Testament canon builds upon the Hebrew Tanakh (Torah, Nevi'im, Ketuvim) but includes additional books found in the Greek Septuagint. The Septuagint was the Bible of the apostles and early Church—it's what Jesus and the apostles quoted from. This 3rd-century BC Greek translation included 46 books, which became the Catholic Old Testament.
3rd Century BC
Septuagint Translation: 72 Jewish scholars translate Hebrew Scriptures into Greek in Alexandria, including deuterocanonical books
1st Century AD
Apostolic Era: Jesus and apostles use and quote from the Septuagint, treating deuterocanonical books as Scripture
382-405 AD
St. Jerome's Vulgate: Pope Damasus I commissions Jerome to translate the complete 73-book Bible into Latin
393-419 AD
African Councils: Councils of Hippo and Carthage definitively list the 73-book canon
1546 AD
Council of Trent: Solemnly defines the 73-book canon in response to Protestant rejection
✝️ The Council of Trent's Definition
—Council of Trent, Session IV
🔍 Criteria for Canonicity
The Church used consistent criteria to determine canonical books:
Divine Inspiration: Written under the guidance of the Holy Spirit
Apostolic Origin: Written by or connected to the apostles
Universal Acceptance: Recognized by the universal Church
Liturgical Use: Used in the Church's worship and teaching
Doctrinal Harmony: Consistent with apostolic teaching
The Deuterocanonical Books
📜 The "Second Canon" Books
The term "deuterocanonical" (meaning "second canon") was coined by Catholic scholars to distinguish these books from the "protocanonical" books that were never disputed. This terminology doesn't imply lesser authority—all 73 books have equal divine inspiration.
🔍 Why These Books Matter
The deuterocanonical books contain important teachings that support distinctly Catholic doctrines:
Prayers for the Dead: 2 Maccabees 12:43-46 supports the doctrine of Purgatory
Intercession of Saints: 2 Maccabees 15:14 shows saints praying for the living
Almsgiving and Merit: Tobit 12:9 teaches that almsgiving delivers from death
Wisdom Literature: Wisdom and Sirach provide profound spiritual insights
⚔️ Protestant Rejection
Protestants reject these books primarily because they support Catholic teachings that contradict Protestant theology. Martin Luther famously wanted to remove books that contradicted his new doctrines, calling them "Apocrypha" (hidden books) and relegating them to an appendix. However, these books were accepted by the Church for over 1,000 years before the Reformation.
📚 The Masoretic Text Problem
Protestant reformers preferred the later Jewish Masoretic text over the Septuagint. However, the Masoretic text was compiled by Jews who had already rejected Christianity and deliberately excluded books that supported Christian claims. The irony is that Protestants accepted the judgment of non-Christian Jews over the Christian Church regarding which books are Scripture.
Protestant Reformers and Translation Problems
⚔️ John Wycliffe's Errors
John Wycliffe (c. 1330-1384) was one of the first to challenge the biblical canon, but his motivations were questionable. Wycliffe rejected Church authority in an "anti-clerical mood" and taught numerous heresies including denial of transubstantiation and Donatism. The Council of Constance condemned his errors, showing that canon revision often accompanies doctrinal rebellion.
📚 Martin Luther's Biased Translation
Luther's German Bible contained clear biases based on his theological innovations. Most notoriously, he added the word "alone" to Romans 3:28 to support his doctrine of justification by faith alone—a word that appears nowhere in the original Greek text. When criticized, Luther famously replied that his translation was correct because "so wills Dr. Martin Luther."
🏛️ Translation Problems
Luther's Addition: Romans 3:28 - added "alone" (German: allein)
Original Greek: "Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law"
Luther's German: "So halten wir nun dafür, daß der Mensch gerecht werde ohne des Gesetzes Werke, allein durch den Glauben"
Problem: Adding words to Scripture to support theological positions
🛡️ Tyndale and English Persecution
William Tyndale's English translation contained many errors and anti-clerical biases, as demonstrated by St. Thomas More's scholarly critiques. Ironically, Tyndale was executed not by the Catholic Church but by Protestant King Henry VIII—the same Henry VIII who later used Tyndale's work as the basis for his own "Great Bible."
✝️ The Catholic Response: Douay-Rheims
In response to these biased Protestant translations, Catholic scholars produced the Douay-Rheims Bible (1582-1609), carefully translated from the Vulgate to provide English-speaking Catholics with an accurate, complete Bible. This translation maintained the full 73-book canon and avoided the theological biases that plagued Protestant versions.
The King James Version: A Beautiful but Incomplete Testament
📚 The KJV's Noble Origins
The King James Version (1611) represents one of the finest achievements in English biblical translation. Commissioned by King James I to create a translation for the Church of England, it was produced by some of the era's most skilled scholars and linguists. The KJV's majestic language, poetic beauty, and scholarly rigor made it a masterpiece of English literature as well as a religious text.
🔍 Scholarly Excellence with Limitations
The KJV translators demonstrated remarkable scholarship, consulting multiple sources including:
The Vulgate: St. Jerome's authoritative Latin translation
The Douay-Rheims: The scholarly Catholic English translation
Greek Manuscripts: Available New Testament sources
Hebrew Texts: Old Testament manuscripts
However, working within Protestant theological constraints, they maintained the reduced 66-book canon established by earlier reformers.
🏛️ The KJV's Enduring Impact
Literary Achievement: Created some of the most beautiful religious prose in English
Cultural Influence: Shaped English-speaking Christianity for centuries
Scholarly Methodology: Demonstrated careful comparative translation work
Theological Limitation: Preserved the Protestant reduction of the biblical canon from 73 to 66 books
🛡️ Unintended Consequences
The KJV's remarkable success and beauty created some unintended problems for biblical understanding:
Canon Assumption: Many came to assume the 66-book canon was original and universal
Historical Amnesia: Knowledge of the earlier, fuller biblical tradition was gradually lost
Translation Reverence: Some began treating the English translation as equivalent to the original texts
Ecumenical Barrier: The different canon sizes became a stumbling block in Catholic-Protestant dialogue
🔍 The Theological Challenge
The KJV's excellence makes the canon question more poignant rather than less important. This beautiful translation represents the best of Protestant scholarship applied to an incomplete collection of biblical books. Catholics can appreciate the KJV's literary and scholarly merits while recognizing that even the most beautiful translation cannot overcome the theological problem of the reduced canon.
✝️ A Bridge for Understanding
Catholics engaging with KJV-tradition Protestants can acknowledge the translation's genuine excellence while gently pointing out the historical question: "Why do we have different numbers of books, and which tradition better preserves the complete biblical witness received from the apostolic Church?" This approach respects Protestant scholarship while raising the essential historical and theological questions.
382-405 AD: St. Jerome's Vulgate establishes 73-book standard
1380s: Wycliffe challenges canon amid heretical teachings
1522: Luther removes deuterocanonical books
1582-1609: Douay-Rheims preserves full Catholic canon
1611: KJV institutionalizes Protestant reduction
Result: 1,500 years of Christian tradition abandoned for theological convenience
Protestant Arguments and Catholic Responses
⚔️ Common Protestant Objections
Objection 1: "These books weren't in the Hebrew Bible"
Catholic Response: The Septuagint was the Bible of the apostles and early Church. Jesus and the apostles quoted from deuterocanonical books and treated them as Scripture. The later Hebrew canon was compiled by Jews who had rejected Christianity.
Objection 2: "They contain historical errors"
Catholic Response: The same could be said of protocanonical books, which also contain apparent discrepancies when read as modern historical accounts rather than theological literature. Inspiration doesn't require modern historical precision.
Objection 3: "They teach Catholic doctrines"
Catholic Response: This reveals the real motive—these books are rejected because they contradict Protestant innovations, not because of genuine canonical concerns.
🔍 The Authority Question
The fundamental issue is authority: who has the right to determine which books belong in the Bible? Protestants implicitly accept Church authority for the New Testament while rejecting it for the Old Testament. They accept the Church's authority to determine what is Scripture while denying its authority to interpret Scripture.
✝️ Early Church Witness
The early Church Fathers regularly quoted from and treated deuterocanonical books as Scripture:
St. Augustine: Listed all 73 books as canonical
St. Jerome: Initially hesitant, but included them in the Vulgate under papal authority
Councils of Hippo and Carthage: Formally listed the 73-book canon
Pope Damasus I: Commissioned the complete 73-book Vulgate
🛡️ What Catholics Are Missing
When Protestants reject the deuterocanonical books, they lose:
Rich Spiritual Wisdom: Sirach and Wisdom contain profound insights
Historical Context: Maccabees explains the background to Jesus' time
Theological Development: Clear teaching on resurrection, angels, and afterlife
Devotional Material: Beautiful prayers and moral instruction
Prophetic Fulfillment: Messianic prophecies fulfilled in Christ
The Canon and Church Authority
🔍 The Logical Problem of Sola Scriptura
The canon question exposes the fundamental flaw in sola scriptura: if Scripture is the sole rule of faith, how do we know which books constitute Scripture? The Bible doesn't contain its own table of contents, and different Christian communities have recognized different canons throughout history.
🏛️ Catholic vs. Protestant Logic
Catholic Position: The Church, guided by the Holy Spirit, determines the canon and interprets Scripture
Protestant Position: Scripture alone is the rule of faith, but the Church determined what is Scripture
Logical Problem: Protestants must accept Church authority to have Scripture, then reject Church authority to interpret Scripture
Result: Inconsistent application of Church authority based on theological convenience
📚 St. Augustine's Insight
St. Augustine famously wrote: "I would not believe the Gospel myself if the authority of the Catholic Church did not influence me to do so." This acknowledges that we know which books are Scripture because the Church tells us, not because the books authenticate themselves.
✝️ The Church's Role
The Catholic Church doesn't claim to create Scripture but to recognize it under the Holy Spirit's guidance. Just as the Church didn't create the apostolic deposit but preserves it, so the Church didn't create the biblical canon but discerned it. This discernment required divine assistance, which Christ promised to His Church.
🛡️ Modern Applications
Understanding the canon's development helps Catholics in several ways:
Apologetics: Defending the full 73-book Bible against Protestant objections
Scripture Study: Appreciating the complete biblical witness
Church Authority: Understanding why the Magisterium is necessary
Historical Awareness: Recognizing Protestant innovations as departures from tradition
Practical Implications for Catholics Today
🛡️ Reading the Complete Bible
Catholics should familiarize themselves with the deuterocanonical books that many have never read. These books contain beautiful spiritual wisdom, historical insights, and clear teachings that support Catholic doctrine. They're not "lesser" Scripture but equally inspired by the Holy Spirit.
🔍 Apologetic Preparedness
Catholics need to be prepared to explain why their Bible has more books than Protestant Bibles. This isn't about Catholics adding books but about Protestants removing books that had been in Christian Bibles for over 1,500 years. The burden of proof lies with those who changed the traditional canon.
📚 Educational Importance
Catholic education should teach the history of the biblical canon, helping students understand that:
The Church predates the Bible and determined its contents
Protestant canons are innovations of the 16th century
Catholic tradition is more ancient and historically grounded
Scripture and Tradition work together as sources of revelation
✝️ Ecumenical Dialogue
In dialogue with Protestants, Catholics should emphasize that the canon question reveals the necessity of Church authority. Without some authoritative body to determine what is Scripture, Christianity dissolves into competing opinions about which books are divinely inspired.
📝 Study Questions for Reflection
- How does the biblical canon demonstrate the necessity of Church authority? Why can't Scripture be "self-authenticating"?
- What criteria did the early Church use to determine which books belonged in the biblical canon?
- Why did Protestant reformers reject the deuterocanonical books? How do their reasons reveal theological rather than historical motivations?
- How does the Septuagint's role in the apostolic Church support the Catholic canon?
- What logical problems face Protestants who accept Church authority for the canon but reject it for interpretation?
- How do the deuterocanonical books support distinctly Catholic teachings?
- What can we learn from the translation controversies surrounding figures like Luther and Tyndale?
- How should Catholics respond when Protestants claim the deuterocanonical books contain "errors"?
- Why is it significant that the Council of Trent "confirmed" rather than "created" the biblical canon?
- How can understanding the canon's history strengthen Catholic faith and apologetic efforts?
Conclusion: The Complete Word of God
✝️ The Church's Gift
The biblical canon is one of the Church's greatest gifts to humanity. Under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, the Church discerned which books contained God's inspired Word and preserved them for all generations. This wasn't an arbitrary decision but a careful process guided by divine providence.
🔍 Unity of Scripture and Tradition
The canon's formation demonstrates the unity of Scripture and Tradition. Sacred Tradition determined which books constitute Sacred Scripture, and Sacred Scripture must be interpreted within Sacred Tradition. They are not competing authorities but complementary sources of the one divine revelation.
🛡️ Our Responsibility
Catholics today have the privilege of possessing the complete biblical canon that was recognized by the universal Church for over 1,500 years. With this privilege comes the responsibility to read, study, and defend the complete Word of God, including those books that Protestant reformers removed for theological reasons.
—Second Vatican Council, Dei Verbum 9
Comments
Post a Comment